Safe Handling of Hazardous Drugs — Part 1: Drug Identification, Risk Assessment, and Engineering Controls

Hazardous drug definitions, NIOSH classification criteria, national drug list organization, exposure routes and health effects, facility risk assessment, and complete engineering control specifications including BSCs, CACIs, CSTDs, and ventilation requirements.

guidelinesMar 2026guidelines

1. Definition and Identification of Hazardous Drugs

1.1 Definition

A hazardous drug (HD) is any drug that exhibits one or more of six specified characteristics based on established toxicological and clinical criteria. The definition encompasses far more than traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy — it includes hormonal agents, antiviral drugs, immunosuppressants, and other pharmaceutical classes that meet hazard thresholds.1

A drug is classified as hazardous if it demonstrates any of the following properties:

CriterionDefinitionExamples
CarcinogenicityEvidence of causing cancer in humans or animals based on International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Group 1, 2A, or 2B classification, or equivalent evidenceCyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, tamoxifen
TeratogenicityEvidence of causing developmental abnormalities in the fetus when exposure occurs during pregnancy; includes FDA Pregnancy Category D or X designations (legacy system) or current labeling with reproductive harm warningsMethotrexate, thalidomide, lenalidomide, mycophenolate
Reproductive toxicityEvidence of impairing fertility, causing menstrual irregularities, oligospermia, or impaired spermatogenesis in humans or animalsVinca alkaloids, platinum compounds, alkylating agents
Organ toxicity at low dosesDemonstrated toxicity to one or more organ systems at doses below therapeutic thresholds in animal models or humansMany targeted kinase inhibitors, some immunosuppressants
GenotoxicityEvidence of causing damage to genetic material, including mutagenicity, clastogenicity, or ability to cause chromosomal aberrationsAlkylating agents, topoisomerase inhibitors
Structure and toxicity profile mimicryNew drugs whose structure and toxicity profiles closely mimic existing drugs already classified as hazardous by the above criteriaBiosimilars of hazardous monoclonal antibodies; structural analogs of known hazardous agents

1.2 National Hazardous Drug List

The national reference list of hazardous drugs in healthcare settings is maintained by a federal occupational safety research institute and is updated periodically (approximately every two years) based on ongoing literature review and expert evaluation. This list is organized into three tables that serve distinct purposes in guiding the level of precautions required.2

Table 1: Antineoplastic Drugs

Table 1 contains drugs that are confirmed antineoplastic (anticancer) agents. These drugs carry the highest level of occupational risk and require the most stringent handling precautions, including:

  • Use of engineering controls (biological safety cabinets or isolators) for all compounding
  • Closed-system drug transfer devices where appropriate
  • Full personal protective equipment for compounding, administration, and patient care
  • Dedicated negative-pressure storage and compounding areas
  • Medical surveillance for exposed workers

Representative examples of Table 1 agents by pharmacological class:

Drug ClassExamples
Alkylating agentsCyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, melphalan, busulfan, chlorambucil, carmustine, lomustine, temozolomide, bendamustine, thiotepa, mechlorethamine
AntimetabolitesMethotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, cytarabine, gemcitabine, fludarabine, cladribine, clofarabine, pemetrexed, capecitabine, nelarabine
Anthracyclines / Antitumor antibioticsDoxorubicin, daunorubicin, epirubicin, idarubicin, mitoxantrone, bleomycin, dactinomycin, mitomycin C
Vinca alkaloidsVincristine, vinblastine, vinorelbine
TaxanesPaclitaxel, docetaxel, cabazitaxel
Platinum compoundsCisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin
Topoisomerase inhibitorsEtoposide, irinotecan, topotecan
Targeted small moleculesImatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, sorafenib, sunitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib, pazopanib, regorafenib, lenvatinib, cabozantinib, ibrutinib, idelalisib, venetoclax, ruxolitinib, many others
Hormonal antineoplasticsTamoxifen, flutamide, bicalutamide, abiraterone, enzalutamide
Monoclonal antibodies (conjugated/toxic payload)Ado-trastuzumab emtansine, brentuximab vedotin, inotuzumab ozogamicin, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, polatuzumab vedotin, enfortumab vedotin
Immunomodulatory agentsThalidomide, lenalidomide, pomalidomide
Miscellaneous antineoplasticsArsenic trioxide, tretinoin, bexarotene, romidepsin, vorinostat, procarbazine

Table 2: Non-Antineoplastic Hazardous Drugs

Table 2 contains drugs that meet one or more hazard criteria but are not primarily used as antineoplastic agents. These drugs require hazardous drug handling precautions that may be adjusted based on the dosage form, route of administration, and the specific activity being performed. Key considerations:

  • Intact oral or topical dosage forms that are not altered (not crushed, split, or manipulated) may not require the same level of containment as compounding or parenteral preparation
  • A facility-level assessment of risk determines the extent of engineering controls and PPE required
  • These drugs still require hazardous drug labeling, storage considerations, and spill procedures

Representative examples of Table 2 agents:

Drug CategoryExamples
Antiviral agentsGanciclovir, valganciclovir, ribavirin, zidovudine, cidofovir
ImmunosuppressantsMycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, azathioprine
Hormonal agents (non-antineoplastic use)Estradiol, conjugated estrogens, medroxyprogesterone, testosterone, danazol, mifepristone, misoprostol, oxytocin (in certain formulations)
AntiepilepticsPhenytoin, carbamazepine, valproic acid, phenobarbital
Psychiatric medicationsParoxetine, fluoxetine, risperidone (select formulations)
Cardiovascular agentsColchicine, warfarin (in some classifications), spironolactone
MiscellaneousFinasteride, dutasteride, leflunomide, bosentan, ambrisentan, chloramphenicol

Table 3: Drugs with Reproductive Risk

Table 3 contains drugs that primarily pose a risk to the reproductive health of workers through exposure but may not meet other hazard criteria. These drugs mainly carry teratogenic or reproductive toxicity concerns. Handling precautions focus on:

  • Preventing exposure in workers who are pregnant, actively trying to conceive, or breastfeeding
  • Using gloves and other appropriate PPE when manipulating dosage forms
  • Providing reproductive health counseling

Representative examples include isotretinoin, acitretin, misoprostol (at lower risk thresholds), certain anticonvulsants, and other agents with established reproductive toxicity.

1.3 Institutional Hazardous Drug List

Each facility must maintain its own hazardous drug list that, at minimum, includes all drugs on the national reference list that are present in the facility’s formulary. The institutional list must be:3

  • Reviewed at least every 12 months
  • Updated when new drugs are added to the formulary
  • Updated when the national reference list is revised
  • Accessible to all personnel who handle or may be exposed to hazardous drugs
  • Used as the basis for determining handling precautions, PPE requirements, and engineering controls

When a newly approved drug is added to the formulary and has not yet appeared on the national reference list, the facility must evaluate the drug’s Safety Data Sheet (SDS), package insert, and available toxicological data to determine whether it meets any of the six hazard criteria. If any criterion is met, the drug must be added to the institutional hazardous drug list and handled accordingly.


2. Exposure Routes and Health Effects

2.1 Routes of Occupational Exposure

Healthcare workers may be exposed to hazardous drugs through four primary routes:

Dermal Absorption (Most Common Route)

Skin contact is the most frequent and often underrecognized route of occupational exposure. Hazardous drug contamination has been documented on:

  • Exterior surfaces of drug vials and packaging (present from the manufacturing facility)
  • Countertops, floors, and work surfaces in pharmacies and treatment areas
  • IV bags, tubing, and administration sets
  • Doorknobs, telephones, and keyboards in treatment areas
  • Glove surfaces (permeation through inadequate gloves)

Many hazardous drugs are readily absorbed through intact skin. Surface wipe sampling studies have consistently demonstrated measurable contamination on surfaces throughout drug preparation and administration areas, even in facilities with active safe handling programs.4

Inhalation

Aerosolization can occur during:

  • Compounding and reconstitution (when vials are pressurized)
  • Priming IV tubing
  • Manipulating syringes (ejecting air)
  • Crushing tablets
  • Opening ampules
  • Cleaning spills
  • Patient care activities (aerosolized drug in patient exhalation)

Drugs with significant vapor pressure at room temperature (e.g., carmustine, cyclophosphamide, nitrogen mustard) may generate vapors even from intact liquid formulations. Some drugs also exist as particulate aerosols that can remain suspended in air.

Ingestion

Inadvertent ingestion may result from:

  • Hand-to-mouth contact in contaminated work areas
  • Eating, drinking, or applying cosmetics in drug handling areas
  • Inadequate hand hygiene after glove removal

Injection / Needlestick

Direct parenteral exposure can occur through:

  • Needlestick injuries during preparation or administration
  • Sharps injuries from broken vials or ampules
  • Cuts from contaminated glass

2.2 Documented Health Effects of Occupational Exposure

Health Effect CategoryDocumented Findings
Acute effectsSkin rashes, dermatitis, hair thinning/loss, nausea, headache, dizziness, throat irritation, eye irritation, nasal sores, hyperpigmentation of skin
Chromosomal damageIncreased chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges, and micronuclei in peripheral blood lymphocytes of exposed workers compared to controls
Reproductive effectsIncreased risk of spontaneous abortion (multiple studies showing odds ratios of 1.5–3.5), menstrual irregularities, infertility, low birth weight, congenital malformations, ectopic pregnancy
Cancer riskElevated risk of leukemia and other cancers reported in some cohort studies of workers with prolonged, unprotected exposure; however, confounders make definitive causation difficult to establish
Organ toxicityHepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and other organ-specific effects have been reported in case reports of acute high-dose accidental exposure

3. Facility-Level Risk Assessment

3.1 Assessment of Risk

Every entity that handles hazardous drugs must conduct a facility-specific risk assessment to determine the types of engineering controls, PPE, and procedures required. The assessment of risk must include:5

  1. Inventory of all hazardous drugs present in the facility (the institutional hazardous drug list)
  2. Identification of all activities involving hazardous drugs:
    • Receiving and unpacking
    • Storage
    • Compounding (sterile and non-sterile)
    • Dispensing
    • Administration
    • Patient care activities (handling body fluids, linen)
    • Spill response
    • Waste handling and disposal
    • Transport
    • Maintenance and repair of contaminated equipment
  3. Determination of the dosage form (injectable, oral solid, oral liquid, topical, inhaled)
  4. Assessment of manipulation required (intact dosage forms vs. crushing, splitting, compounding)
  5. Frequency and volume of hazardous drug handling
  6. Number of workers potentially exposed
  7. Current control measures in place and their adequacy
  8. Review of any exposure incidents, spill events, and surface contamination monitoring data

3.2 Hierarchy of Controls

Protective measures must follow the established hierarchy of controls, prioritizing engineering and administrative controls before relying on personal protective equipment:6

  1. Elimination/Substitution — Use of less hazardous alternatives when clinically appropriate (rarely applicable, as drug selection is driven by clinical need)
  2. Engineering controls — Physical containment devices and ventilated environments (highest priority for implementation)
  3. Administrative controls — Policies, procedures, training, signage, work practice modifications, medical surveillance
  4. Personal protective equipment (PPE) — The last line of defense; necessary but never sufficient alone

4. Engineering Controls

4.1 Biological Safety Cabinets (BSCs)

Biological safety cabinets are the primary engineering control for sterile and non-sterile compounding of hazardous drugs. The specific BSC type required depends on the activity and the regulatory framework in the facility’s jurisdiction.7

Class II Type B2 BSC (Required for HD Compounding)

The Class II Type B2 BSC is the standard of care for hazardous drug compounding. Its specifications:

SpecificationRequirement
Airflow type100% exhaust, zero recirculation to the room
Downflow airHEPA-filtered supply air provides product protection (ISO Class 5 / Class 100 environment at the work surface)
Inflow airRoom air drawn through the front opening provides personnel protection; minimum inflow velocity of 100 feet per minute (0.5 m/s)
ExhaustAll contaminated air passes through a HEPA filter before being exhausted to the outside atmosphere through a dedicated, sealed hard-duct system
External exhaustMust be ducted to the outside; cannot recirculate to the building HVAC system
CertificationMust be certified at installation, after relocation, after HEPA filter changes, and at least every 6 months by a qualified technician per NSF/ANSI 49 standards
Work surfaceSolid work surface with drain trough; must be decontaminated, deactivated, and cleaned before and after each use and at the end of each shift

Class II Type A2 BSC

A Class II Type A2 BSC may be considered when the following conditions are met:

  • The BSC is connected to the outside through a canopy connection or thimble (snorkel) connection
  • This type recirculates approximately 70% of HEPA-filtered air to the room and exhausts approximately 30% through a HEPA filter; therefore, it provides less protection than a B2
  • Acceptable only for low-volume HD compounding in some jurisdictions or when a B2 is not feasible, provided the facility’s assessment of risk supports its use and the exhaust is appropriately vented
  • Not acceptable for volatile hazardous drugs (those with significant vapor pressure) because HEPA filters do not capture vapors or gases

Key BSC Operational Requirements

  • Allow the BSC to operate for a minimum purge time (manufacturer-specified, typically at least 5 minutes) before beginning work and after completing work
  • Do not place materials or equipment within 6 inches of the air intake grilles on the work surface
  • Work at least 6 inches inside the front opening
  • Do not disrupt airflow by rapid arm movements, opening/closing doors, or foot traffic in front of the BSC
  • Place a plastic-backed absorbent pad (chemo-rated) on the work surface; change when visibly contaminated, after a spill, and at the end of each compounding session
  • Clean and decontaminate the BSC using appropriate agents (see Part 3) before and after compounding and when contamination is suspected
  • Do not use the BSC for non-hazardous compounding simultaneously with hazardous drug compounding

4.2 Compounding Aseptic Containment Isolators (CACIs)

CACIs are sealed, negative-pressure isolator units that provide an alternative to BSCs for hazardous drug compounding. They provide both product protection (ISO Class 5 environment) and personnel/environmental protection.8

SpecificationRequirement
EnclosureFully sealed chamber with glove ports (no open front)
PressureNegative pressure relative to the surrounding room
Air filtrationHEPA-filtered supply air; all exhaust air passes through HEPA filtration before discharge
ExhaustShould be externally vented; if recirculated through redundant HEPA filtration, must meet risk assessment criteria
ISO classificationMust provide ISO Class 5 (Class 100) or better at the work surface
AccessGlove-port access; materials enter/exit through antechambers or pass-throughs
CertificationCertified per CETA (Controlled Environment Testing Association) standards; typically every 6 months
AdvantagesGreater containment than open-front BSCs; reduced risk of operator exposure; suitable for volatile agents
LimitationsReduced dexterity due to glove ports; limited work space; longer setup times; may not accommodate large-volume compounding

4.3 Closed-System Drug Transfer Devices (CSTDs)

A closed-system drug transfer device (CSTD) is a drug transfer device that mechanically prohibits the transfer of environmental contaminants into the system and the escape of hazardous drug or vapor concentrations outside the system.9

CSTD Requirements

RequirementDetail
Definition standardMust meet the definition of mechanically preventing escape of drug vapor or aerosol and ingress of environmental contamination during drug transfer
TestingThe device must have been evaluated and demonstrated containment performance; facilities should review manufacturer testing data for vapor containment and leak prevention
Compounding useCSTDs are supplemental to, not a replacement for, ventilated engineering controls (BSCs/CACIs) during compounding
Administration useCSTDs are required for administration of antineoplastic hazardous drugs (Table 1 agents); they provide the primary engineering control at the point of care during drug administration
Non-antineoplastic HDsAssessment of risk determines CSTD use during administration of Table 2 and Table 3 agents
Component typesA complete CSTD system typically includes: vial adaptor/spike, syringe adaptor, and IV line adaptor (injection site)
Staff trainingAll users must be trained on proper CSTD use, including connection, drug transfer, disconnection, and device disposal

Types of CSTD Mechanisms

Mechanism TypeDescription
Physical barrierUses a sealed membrane or septum that is pierced by an internal cannula; the drug pathway is physically isolated from the environment at all times
Air-cleaningContains a filter or scrubbing element to capture escaping drug vapor; some designs use activated carbon filters or HEPA filtration
CombinationIntegrates both physical barrier and air-cleaning features

Important considerations regarding CSTDs:

  • CSTDs do not eliminate the need for BSCs or CACIs during compounding; they are used within these devices as an additional layer of containment
  • Not all CSTDs have been equally validated for vapor containment; facilities should evaluate published performance data
  • CSTDs do not maintain sterility of the drug product unless the device is specifically designed and tested for this purpose
  • Staff must be trained on proper CSTD technique; improper use negates the containment benefit
  • CSTD connections must be verified as secure before each drug transfer

4.4 Ventilation Requirements

Compounding Area Ventilation

The area where hazardous drug compounding occurs must meet specific ventilation standards:10

ParameterRequirement
Room pressureNegative pressure relative to adjacent areas (minimum -0.01 inches of water column)
Air changes per hour (ACPH)Minimum of 12 ACPH for rooms with BSCs exhausted externally; refer to facility engineering specifications for isolator rooms
External exhaustThe room must have 100% externally exhausted air; no recirculation of air to other parts of the facility
Air handlingThe room’s HVAC system must be independent or appropriately configured to prevent cross-contamination with non-hazardous compounding areas and general building areas
MonitoringContinuous pressure monitoring with alarmed systems to alert personnel if the room loses negative pressure
AnteroomA line of demarcation or anteroom should separate the HD compounding area from non-HD areas; in some regulatory frameworks, a full anteroom with ISO 7 classification is required for sterile HD compounding

Containment Segregated Compounding Area (C-SCA)

For facilities where a full negative-pressure cleanroom suite is not required (e.g., low-volume HD compounding of non-sterile preparations or when allowed by the facility’s assessment of risk for certain dosage forms), a Containment Segregated Compounding Area (C-SCA) may be used:11

ParameterC-SCA Requirement
DefinitionA designated, unclassified area with fixed walls, a door, and sink, used for non-sterile HD compounding or for certain HD activities where a cleanroom is not mandated
PressureNegative pressure relative to surrounding areas
VentilationExternally vented; minimum 12 ACPH
Engineering control withinMust contain a BSC or CACI for compounding activities
RestrictionsNon-hazardous compounding must not occur in the C-SCA simultaneously with hazardous compounding; only HD-related activities should occur in this space
Appropriate forNon-sterile HD compounding; unpacking HD shipments (if not done elsewhere); some jurisdictions allow sterile HD compounding in a C-SCA under specific conditions with appropriate risk assessment

Storage Area Ventilation

ParameterRequirement
Dedicated storageHazardous drugs must be stored separately from non-hazardous inventory
Negative pressureStorage areas should be negative pressure relative to surrounding areas; at minimum, must have sufficient general ventilation to prevent accumulation of airborne drug concentrations
SignageStorage areas must be clearly labeled to identify the presence of hazardous drugs
AccessAccess should be limited to authorized personnel
Refrigerator/freezerHazardous drugs requiring refrigeration or freezing must be stored in a dedicated refrigerator or freezer, or in a separate, clearly marked section of a shared unit; ventilation of these units must be considered

4.5 Supplemental Engineering Controls

ControlApplication
Needleless systemsLuer-lock and needleless connections reduce the risk of needlestick exposure and aerosolization during administration
Plastic-backed absorbent padsPlaced on work surfaces during compounding and administration to contain drips and spills
Hazardous drug–rated sharps containersPuncture-resistant, leak-proof containers specifically designated for HD-contaminated sharps
Sealed waste containersFor containment of all HD-contaminated materials during the handling process
Automated compounding devicesRobotic systems and automated compounders can reduce direct operator exposure; must be validated for HD use and properly decontaminated

5. Facility Design Considerations

5.1 Workflow and Layout Principles

Facility design for hazardous drug handling should incorporate the following principles:

  • Unidirectional workflow: Movement of drugs, materials, and personnel should follow a logical, one-directional path from receipt through compounding to dispensing, minimizing backtracking that increases contamination risk
  • Physical separation: Hazardous drug compounding areas must be physically separated from non-hazardous compounding areas. Ideally, HD compounding occurs in a separate room with its own anteroom
  • Minimize traffic: The HD compounding area should be designed to minimize non-essential personnel traffic through the space
  • Surfaces: Walls, ceilings, floors, and work surfaces in HD handling areas should be smooth, impervious, non-porous, and resistant to chemical damage to facilitate decontamination
  • Sink access: Handwashing sinks and emergency eyewash stations must be readily accessible in all HD handling areas
  • Emergency equipment: Spill kits must be available in all areas where hazardous drugs are handled, including compounding, administration, storage, and waste handling areas

5.2 Signage Requirements

All areas where hazardous drugs are stored, compounded, administered, or disposed of must be clearly identified with:

  • Hazardous drug warning signs at all entry points
  • Labeling of individual drug storage locations (bins, shelves, refrigerators)
  • Location signs for spill kits and emergency equipment
  • PPE requirement signs indicating the minimum PPE needed for entry and specific activities
  • Waste stream identification signs to guide proper disposal

References


  1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). “NIOSH List of Antineoplastic and Other Hazardous Drugs in Healthcare Settings, 2016.” NIOSH Publication No. 2016-161 (Superceded by 2020 update). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The six criteria for hazardous drug identification were first articulated in the 2004 NIOSH Alert and have been retained in all subsequent editions. ↩︎

  2. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). “NIOSH List of Antineoplastic and Other Hazardous Drugs in Healthcare Settings, 2016.” NIOSH Publication No. 2016-161. Updated 2020. The three-table organization (Table 1: Antineoplastic drugs; Table 2: Non-antineoplastic hazardous drugs; Table 3: Drugs primarily posing reproductive risk) was introduced in the 2014 revision and maintained in subsequent editions. ↩︎

  3. United States Pharmacopeia. General Chapter <800> Hazardous Drugs — Handling in Healthcare Settings. USP Compounding Compendium. Rockville, MD: United States Pharmacopeial Convention; 2017. Section on list of hazardous drugs and institutional assessment. ↩︎

  4. Connor TH, MacKenzie BA, DeBord DG, et al. “NIOSH List of Antineoplastic and Other Hazardous Drugs in Healthcare Settings, 2014.” NIOSH Publication No. 2014-138 (Superceded). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surface contamination literature reviewed therein. ↩︎

  5. United States Pharmacopeia. General Chapter <800> Hazardous Drugs — Handling in Healthcare Settings. Section: Assessment of Risk. Facilities must perform and document a facility-specific assessment of risk to identify hazardous drugs in use and the activities that involve potential exposure. ↩︎

  6. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). “Preventing Occupational Exposures to Antineoplastic and Other Hazardous Drugs in Health Care Settings.” NIOSH Publication No. 2004-165 (NIOSH Alert). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004. Hierarchy of controls framework. ↩︎

  7. United States Pharmacopeia. General Chapter <800> Hazardous Drugs — Handling in Healthcare Settings. Section: Engineering Controls. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). “ASHP Guidelines on Handling Hazardous Drugs.” Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 63:1172-1193, 2006. Updated 2018. ↩︎

  8. Controlled Environment Testing Association (CETA). “Compounding Isolator Testing Guide (CAG-003).” CETA Applications Guide. International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). “ISOPP Standards of Practice: Safe Handling of Cytotoxics.” J Oncol Pharm Pract. 13(Suppl):1-81, 2007. ↩︎

  9. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). “A Vapor Containment Performance Protocol for Closed System Transfer Devices Used During Pharmacy Compounding and Administration of Hazardous Drugs.” NIOSH Docket No. 288, 2016. United States Pharmacopeia. General Chapter <800>, Section: Closed-System Transfer Devices. ↩︎

  10. United States Pharmacopeia. General Chapter <800> Hazardous Drugs — Handling in Healthcare Settings. Section: Engineering Controls — Ventilation. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). “ASHP Guidelines on Handling Hazardous Drugs.” Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 63:1172-1193, 2006. ↩︎

  11. United States Pharmacopeia. General Chapter <800> Hazardous Drugs — Handling in Healthcare Settings. Section: Containment Segregated Compounding Area (C-SCA). This provision allows facilities with limited HD compounding volume to use a C-SCA rather than a full cleanroom suite, provided that the assessment of risk supports this approach and all other requirements are met. ↩︎